According to the latest 2025 Foreignforeign tradeAccording to the relevant laws, legal export agency enterprises must simultaneously possess:
It is recommended to verify the enterprise registration information through the National Enterprise Credit Information Publicity System and require the other party to provide a certificate of no violation records in the past three years. I have handled a case where a companys goods were detained at the port for 37 days due to the lack of AEO certification of the agent. Qualification review cannot be ignored.
The industry standard service rate in 2025 is 1.2 - 3% of the cargo value, but special attention should be paid to:
A certain medicalEquipment ExportA merchant once paid an extra cost of 11.7% exceeding the budget due to the unclear agreement on the financing rate. It is recommended to clarify the cost composition formula in the contract.
Build a safety line through a triple - guarantee mechanism:
某汽車零部件企業(yè)采用”30%預(yù)付款+40%見提單+30%尾款”模式,成功規(guī)避代理方挪用貨款的潛在風險。
According to the current policy, agency export can still enjoy tax rebates, but note that:
In 2023, I assisted a chemical enterprise in successfully applying for a 13% tax rebate rate through agency export. The key is to ensure that the information on the customs declaration form, VAT invoice, and foreign exchange collection statement completely match.
Compare the core differences between the two types of service providers:
It is recommended that enterprises with an annual export volume of less than $2 million choose an integrated service provider, and for bulk trade, professional agencies should be considered first.
Focus on checking three dimensions:
An electronics exporter had $200,000 worth of goods detained because the agent did not update the screening of the US Entity List in a timely manner, highlighting the importance of compliance review.
Clarify rights and responsibilities through four key clauses:
In 2024, a furniture exporter did not stipulate the property rights clause, resulting in the agent unilaterally changing the DDP clause and causing an additional tariff dispute. This case is worthy of warning.
? 2025. All Rights Reserved. Shanghai ICP No. 2023007705-2 PSB Record: Shanghai No.31011502009912